Talk:John Bradfield (engineer)

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Civil engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Civil engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Civil engineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Civil engineeringTemplate:WikiProject Civil engineeringCE articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Australia: Queensland / Sydney / Transport Low‑importance

	Australia portal John Bradfield (engineer) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Sydney (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian Transport (assessed as High-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Trains Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

This article was cited (poorly) at a smh opinion piece online on 11 November 2011. Fifelfoo (talk) 04:52, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Design

John Bradfield did not 'design' the Sydney Harbour Bridge... It was based upon a bridge designed by W G Laws and built in Wylam (opened in 1876). And even then the Wylam railway bridge design was adapted by British firm Dorman Long and Co Ltd of Middlesbrough not Bradfield. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.23.117.197 (talk) 12:36, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on John Bradfield (engineer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:39, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 29 December 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved (non-admin closure) ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 07:15, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

– Primary topic for usage and long-term significance. The engineer averages ~40 views per day compared with 4 views per day for the others combined. [1] As the designer of a major landmark this is likely to continue to be the case. Ivar the Boneful (talk) 08:17, 29 December 2019 (UTC) —Relisting. Steel1943 (talk) 18:03, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support. I agree there is a primary topic. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:17, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Randy Kryn (talk) 16:30, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – four obscure guys by this name; no reason to do a primarygrab on one of them. Dicklyon (talk) 05:55, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
weak Oppose - it could be that way but it already is this, doesn't need to be tidied. Being OZ he is my primary topic but not necessarily anyone elses. Dave Rave (talk) 08:23, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Dicklyon plus WP:TITLECHANGES. There is a cost to readers for pageswaps, and no benefit in this case. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:40, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Can't see any primary topic here. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:43, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Job or Jacob

There are a few matches for Bradfield's name with "Jacob" rather than "Job". Which is correct?

See https://www.bing.com/images/search?q=john+jacob+crew+bradfield&qpvt=john+jacob+crew+bradfield&form=IGRE&first=1

MountVic127 (talk) 04:52, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]