Talk:John Bourn

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Politics of the United Kingdom

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

More information:
/
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

user "bluegrouper" has removed the controversy section that was added. If you look at what "bluegrouper" has contributed to wikipedia you find he has solely removed criticism from the National audit office article and from the article of its head (this article).

Um, no. If you'd bothered to look at the history you will see that I actually added the original criticisms, see [1]. --Bluegrouper 18:12, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry my mistake. "bluegrouper" has solely ~~removed criticism~~ contributed to the National audit office article and the article of its head (this article). I have added an encyclopedic "criticism section". I feel this information has a right to be on here. please correct any errors I have made Chendy 00:16, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have condensed justification for travel as it is needlessly long and comes across as overly defensive.Chendy 11:34, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It seems Bluegrouper solely edits this and the NAO page. Bluegrouper consistantly alters sourced statements on this page, with either discussion or by providing sources. Bluegrouper merely changes/distorts statements while leaving the original sourcing, providing the illusion that the Bluegrouper statements are sourced. I feel there may be some Wikipedia:Vanity_guidelines issues. Chendy 12:50, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

please provide a source for "On 22 of these, he was accompanied by his wife Ardita, as befits a public official of his standing." - It is assumption that is not obvious to me and so needs to be sourced.Chendy (talk) 11:16, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on John Bourn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:29, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on John Bourn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304075358/http://www.dgmi.co.uk/leader-ship-team/ to http://www.dgmi.co.uk/leader-ship-team/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:39, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]