Talk:John Bickley (cricketer)
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the page, per the discussion below; the dab page is now populated with three articles. Dekimasuよ! 23:04, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
John Bickley (cricketer) → John Bickley – Currently the only person of this name with an article, the 2 red links look pretty obscure. --Relisted. Dekimasuよ! 23:36, 26 October 2014 (UTC) PatGallacher (talk) 17:51, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
- Comment this article does not appear to be notable either. Perhaps just delete the cricketer as well. John Bickley (politician) was already deleted. -- 67.70.35.44 (talk) 20:54, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
- All first-class cricketers are notable. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:04, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
- The reference is a general database of cricket, so the article does not meet notability by way of the supporting references. WP:GNG Moreover, not all coverage in reliable sources constitutes evidence of notability for the purposes of article creation; for example, directories and databases, ... are all examples of coverage that may not actually support notability when examined, despite their existence as reliable sources. -- 67.70.35.44 (talk) 19:48, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
- Take it to WP:AFD and see how far you get. Good luck! Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 06:46, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
- The reference is a general database of cricket, so the article does not meet notability by way of the supporting references. WP:GNG Moreover, not all coverage in reliable sources constitutes evidence of notability for the purposes of article creation; for example, directories and databases, ... are all examples of coverage that may not actually support notability when examined, despite their existence as reliable sources. -- 67.70.35.44 (talk) 19:48, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
- All first-class cricketers are notable. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:04, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
This person does appear to be notable, see WP:CRIN, but let's deal with one issue at a time. PatGallacher (talk) 21:07, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose leave as is. WP Cricket has notability guidelines which make the article notable. But Google Books shows it is a common name.. not that the parliamentarians stand out either... but. In ictu oculi (talk) 00:45, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose You just need some bugger to create stubs for the two missing MPs and the problem is solved. Oh. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 19:22, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Categories:
- Stub-Class biography articles
- Stub-Class biography (sports and games) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (sports and games) articles
- Sports and games work group articles
- Automatically assessed biography articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Stub-Class cricket articles
- Mid-importance cricket articles
- Stub-Class cricket articles of Mid-importance
- WikiProject Cricket articles