Jump to content

Talk:John B. Curtis

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleJohn B. Curtis was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 2, 2021Good article nomineeListed
February 26, 2023Good article reassessmentDelisted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on November 21, 2008.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that John B. Curtis made the first commercially available chewing gum?
Current status: Delisted good article
WikiProject iconBiography NA‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
NAThis page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconUnited States NA‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
NAThis page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:John B. Curtis/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 19:43, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Comments

  • As one of the main topics, I think it's allowable here to link chewing gum.
  •  Done


  • "spruce resin. He started with a spruce resin" repetitive.
  •  Done


  • "he made from his chewing gum business" no need to repeat chewing gum.
  •  Done


  • "salary of $5 a month" etc, inflate. But also I'd say what he did before how much he earned doing it.
  •  Done


  • salable is a typo.
  •  Done


  • "quantity that had produced" been
  •  Done


  • "in 1848 and 1849.[2] In 1850," repetitive.
  •  Done


  • "before his competition" first mention of competition...
  •  Done


  • "Packing gum" fragment, no period, and why is the other image caption centrally aligned?
  •  Done


  • "week or two" not encyclopedic tone.
  •  Done


  • Did you mention what the "flavored" gum was flavoured as?
  •  Done - researched extensively for the "flavor" and nothing shows in any books, google books, websites, or historical Newspapers.


  • "1,080,139 " too precise by far, nearest $1000 would suffice. Check all other conversions.
  •  Done = this is done with the "-4" parameter in inflation template. The "-5" parameter would give to the nearest $10,000; etc


  • "most expensively built house" is that the same as "expensive house"
  •  Done


  • Consider adding {{clear}} at the end of the Personal section to stop the image on the right crushing the refs.
  •  Done


That's all I have for now. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 07:53, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@The Rambling Man: All issues have been addressed. Can you take another look. Thanks.--Doug Coldwell (Get vaccinated!) 13:18, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright contributor investigation and Good article reassessment

[edit]

This article is part of Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/20210315 and the Good article (GA) drive to reassess and potentially delist over 200 GAs that might contain copyright and other problems. An AN discussion closed with consensus to delist this group of articles en masse, unless a reviewer opens an independent review and can vouch for/verify content of all sources. Please review Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/February 2023 for further information about the GA status of this article, the timeline and process for delisting, and suggestions for improvements. Questions or comments can be made at the project talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:36, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Intent to open an Independent GAR

[edit]

I believe there's potential here to retain Good Article status and will be opening a GAR after the bot runs. ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)Talk to Me! 19:36, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]