Talk:John Anderson, 3rd Viscount Waverley
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Unverified Content
[edit]Hello ReliableAuthority, your changes[1] to John Anderson, 3rd Viscount Waverley need to be verifiable. Niluop (talk) 11:04, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
- How am I meant to verify this information - ask Khoros7 to verify with Lord Waverley himself, since he has already done so once. ReliableAuthority (talk) 15:46, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
Many thanks. ReliableAuthority (talk) 19:26, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
Response to third opinion request: |
The section in question is potentially controversial, and therefore needs sourcing before it can be added to a Wikipedia article, per the guidelines and policies at WP:BLP. Since you obviously have access to this information, it should be easy enough to find a published reference (it has probably been reported in a newspaper, for instance). I have no objection to the information being presented in the article, but it must be referenced with an appropriately reliable source. If no reliable online or printed source is available, however, the information cannot be included. Unfortunately, simply asking Lord Waverley won't do, unless he's actually published it somewhere (in which case, that's your reference), since nobody else has any means of checking what he said.—Anaxial (talk) 18:09, 10 April 2011 (UTC) |
Governs this article. Unsourced or insufficiently sourced contentious claims must be immedately removed from any BLP. Cheers. Collect (talk) 11:45, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
Per ample discussion at WP:BLP/N, the concept that the silly additions about the son belong in this BLP is non-viable. Cheers. Collect (talk) 18:44, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
Lord Waverley is on Leave of Absence
[edit]He is absent from the House of Lords. He has suspended himself. See deleted info on the page for details, which for some Goddamn unknown reason have been repeatedly deleted by some morons.Rodolph (talk) 20:12, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
Some sources (not related to above BLP issue)
[edit]Here are the only sources I could find on Lord Waverley. Links and brief quotes (not necessairly ones to go into article) about the thrust of the articles are below.
- "Vladimir Kozlov, the leader of Kazakhstan's unregistered Alga Party, accused Lord Waverley of attempting to whitewash the poll."
- "By initiating the British-Nagorno Karabakh All-Party Parliamentary Group , Lord Waverley and Baroness Symons have acknowledged the existence of the Republic of Nagorno-Karabakh."
- "adviser to the chairman of KazMunaiGas national company board, Lord Waverley"
Maybe these will be of some use. JBH (talk) 15:54, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on John Anderson, 3rd Viscount Waverley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120724135023/http://lordwaverley.com/index.html to http://www.lordwaverley.com/index.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:40, 24 April 2017 (UTC)