Talk:John Adams (book)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on John Adams (book). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111122050644/http://articles.cnn.com/2001-06-07/entertainment/david.mccullough_1_david-mccullough-adams-and-jefferson-correspondence?_s=PM%3ASHOWBIZ to http://articles.cnn.com/2001-06-07/entertainment/david.mccullough_1_david-mccullough-adams-and-jefferson-correspondence?_s=PM%3ASHOWBIZ
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:54, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
Infobox title
[edit]I added the period to accurately represent the book title, and it was reverted with the edit summary 'It should not'. The book's name includes the title, and this is depicted on the cover using Adams' signature signed with the period. Not using the real name of the book in the title is understandable for styling purposes (although I'd be in favor of using it), but portraying it in the infobox title at least allows the article to lean a bit more towards accuracy. Thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 12:32, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
- I believe MOS:TM supports not including the full stop in the infobox. I added a mention of it in the opening sentence. I think the infobox should follow the WP:COMMONNAME rule. Note that the cited independent reliable sources also omit the period. I checked several of the independent reliable sources that are cited in the article. None of them included the full stop, either in their headlines or their article bodies. If CNN, The Christian Science Monitor, The New Yorker, and The New Republic don't think it is necessary to include the full stop in order to accurately represent the book title, I don't think we should either. — BarrelProof (talk) 01:59, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
- Okay. Good research, thanks. Your opening sentence placement works well. Only reason I knew of this was from a visit to the Adams' burial crypt, where the very informative guide pointed out that the name on the crypt was "John Adams." with the period and that he often signed his name like that. Doubt if I would have noticed the full book title, and unless the book publicist highlighted it I doubt many of its reviewers would have been aware of it. Your good wording in the first mention will be educational for the readers. Randy Kryn (talk) 02:54, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
- I just looked up the book on the publisher's website. It also doesn't include the dot except in the photo of the cover art: https://www.simonandschuster.com/books/John-Adams/David-McCullough/9780743223133. Amazon doesn't have it either. I further modified the description in the opening sentence as a description of the cover art rather than published title. Please have a look. — BarrelProof (talk) 04:36, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
- Adams' signature on the Declaration of Independence and most of his signatures online don't include the dot, although the Treaty of Paris and others do, so he wasn't consistent in signing this way. I added "frequently" which maybe works. My sole knowledge of this is from a tour guide at his crypt, so haven't seen a reputable source. Randy Kryn (talk) 11:46, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
- I just looked up the book on the publisher's website. It also doesn't include the dot except in the photo of the cover art: https://www.simonandschuster.com/books/John-Adams/David-McCullough/9780743223133. Amazon doesn't have it either. I further modified the description in the opening sentence as a description of the cover art rather than published title. Please have a look. — BarrelProof (talk) 04:36, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
- Okay. Good research, thanks. Your opening sentence placement works well. Only reason I knew of this was from a visit to the Adams' burial crypt, where the very informative guide pointed out that the name on the crypt was "John Adams." with the period and that he often signed his name like that. Doubt if I would have noticed the full book title, and unless the book publicist highlighted it I doubt many of its reviewers would have been aware of it. Your good wording in the first mention will be educational for the readers. Randy Kryn (talk) 02:54, 23 April 2021 (UTC)