Talk:John, King of Saxony

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility.

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Royalty and Nobility

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Royalty and Nobility, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of royalty and nobility on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Royalty and NobilityWikipedia:WikiProject Royalty and NobilityTemplate:WikiProject Royalty and NobilityRoyalty and Nobility articles

On 6 September 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from John of Saxony to John, King of Saxony. The result of the discussion was moved.

Article name

I removed the ordinal from the article title since he does not seem to have been known as "John I".

Olessi 20:54, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Full name

"Johann Nepomuk Maria Joseph Anton Xaver Vincenz Aloys Franz de Paula Stanislaus Bernhard Paul Felix Damasus" Olessi 20:57, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

anyhoo

is this the same king john who translated 'the divine comedy' and has a statue in the centre of dresden?--81.101.3.9 19:43, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ancestry

I am reverting the ancestry to better reflect the names of the articles and to bypass redirects. The only standard for consistency in royalty article names is WP:NC(NT), which names kings, emperors and their consorts as Name of Place, other royals as Title Name of Place and lesser sovereigns and holders of substantive titles as Name, Title of Place. Charles 03:10, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What's wrong with redirects? 24.57.196.130 04:27, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:William I of Württemberg#What's wrong with redirects?. Charles 04:57, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 6 September 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) – Material Works 20:34, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

John of Saxony → John, King of Saxony – Avoid confusion with similarly named people. Векочел (talk) 12:43, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support. As above. Celia Homeford (talk) 14:16, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nominator. Killuminator (talk) 14:28, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom; it's too ambiguous. Examples with this exact format already exist, including John, King of England, Anne, Queen of Great Britain, Christina, Queen of Sweden, Niels, King of Denmark, Abel, King of Denmark, etc. Keivan.f^Talk 17:02, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support - I was going to boldly move this as I already have done with Albert, King of Saxony. John of Saxony (disambiguation) should also be moved to John of Saxony. estar8806 (talk) ★ 20:56, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.