Talk:Johari Window (Fringe)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: GRAPPLE X 23:08, 20 March 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
Reading this article is the first time I've dealt with Fringe at all in my life, so this will be from the point of view of a complete outsider. Here goes.
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- Citations seem fine to me, nothing needing one is lacking one.
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- Sources look alright, nothing sticks out as suspect.
- C. No original research:
- The "cultural references" section seems a bit OR-ish to me, but only a tad - I'd say "over-expanded-upon" more than anything else. I'd trim it down to just include the references, without explaining them too much - which you do a little shakily (for instance, no one's deformed in "Deliverance"; you could just say "Walter and Peter whistle "Dueling Banjos" from the film Deliverance" instead.)
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- Gets in all the points it needs to in order to cover the topic properly.
- B. Focused:
- Doesn't stray or meander to other topics, sticks to the article's subject.
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Seems NPOV and unbiased to me.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- Seems stable to me - influx of additions in recent weeks but no disputes or reversions.
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Both images check out, one is fair use, one is creative commons.
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- Both images are used appropriately and captioned.
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- All in all, I'm going to pass this article as a GA. My only concerns are about the one section noted above, and they aren't strong enough to detract from the fact that the rest of the article has been handled well. However, I would like to see this addressed in the future.
- Pass or Fail:
- Thank you for taking the time to review the article. I'll keep your suggestions in mind for the future. Thanks again, Ruby2010 talk 01:09, 21 March 2011 (UTC)