Talk:Johannes Kaiser (Liechtenstein politician)

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

European Microstates: Liechtenstein Low‑importance

	Europe portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Microstates, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of European Microstates on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European MicrostatesWikipedia:WikiProject European MicrostatesTemplate:WikiProject European MicrostatesEuropean Microstates
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Liechtenstein.

Did you know nomination

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that Johannes Kaiser left the Progressive Citizens' Party in Liechtenstein in 2018, but re-joined a year later?
- ALT1: ... that Johannes Kaiser was an independent member of the Landtag of Liechtenstein from 2018 to 2019?
- ALT2: ... that Johannes Kaiser was considered the leading opponent to Liechtenstein's accession to the International Monetary Fund? Source: https://www.vaterland.li/liechtenstein/politik/regierungschef-risch-fordert-den-abgeordneten-kaiser-auf-bei-den-fakten-zu-bleiben-art-574259
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Trembleuse

Created by TheBritinator (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 16 past nominations.

TheBritinator (talk) 01:26, 29 November 2024 (UTC).[reply]

I shall review this. Storye book (talk) 12:20, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Thank you for this interesting window into Liechtenstein's politics. I prefer ALT2, because It is the only one of the three hooks which can be understood instantly by international readers, without clicking on the political link. However, I'm not going to strike any hooks, because technically they are fine.

I have given the article a minor copyedit. That does not affect this review.
Hook citations are taken in good faith (AGF) because the sources have paywalls, and I don't speak the language, anyway.
~~ALT0 needs to mention Liechtenstein, If you can clarify ALT0 to say that it's about Liechtenstein, then this hook will be good to go.~~ Storye book (talk) 13:21, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Storye book: Done. TheBritinator (talk) 13:35, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, TheBritinator. Good to go. Storye book (talk) 14:05, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tenses in biographies of living people

@TheBritinator: Please note that on WP we do not use the present tense for people's actions, in biographies. This is because we cannot guarantee that an article will be constantly updated, so that, for example, by the following year that present tense may well be out of date. That is the reason for the edit, "as of 2024 he was". Please do not revert that kind of edit. Storye book (talk) 10:02, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I do in fact intend on updating this article. TheBritinator (talk) 10:41, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That is not the point. We all intend on updating the articles that we created. But WP house style requires that events are recorded in the past tense, because WP cannot rely on all of us remembering to update promptly all of the time. Our audience is reading our articles when we are on holiday and when we are sleeping. It's not about you personally, it's about the principle. See: Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers#Chronological items, and Template:As of. Storye book (talk) 11:46, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. TheBritinator (talk) 12:59, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]