Talk:Johannes Grant

Biography: Military / Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Scotland Low‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Why Scottish?

Lots of modern works mention that he is "likely" Scottish, up to the point that it is taken and published as a fact, without even noting any alternatives. In the original sources Johannes is, afaik, mentioned by Leonard of Chios and Georgios Sphrantzes, both calling him a German. Leonard adds the "Grandi" which is most likely a descriptive, from the contemporary Italian grande (from Latin grandis) and meaning, among others, "great", "able" or "impressive". Given his performance, this interpretation seems to me highly likely, though one can ignore this reference and simply claim it was a name. It seems that Runciman is the first historian who speculated about him being Scottish, and all other "Scottish" references go back to his. Is there any work of him beyond the pretty short speculation in his "Fall of Constantinople" (p84, footnote on p.217) that bases upon "grandi" and later "grando" meaning "Grant" instead of "great", and is a name more common in Scotland then in Germany? I know that Dunnet speculates for her fictive Scottish version (also based on Runcimans assumption) on a connection to a family of Grants in Aberdeen with relations to the order of Rhodes, but this does not explain in the least why both contemporary sources who have known Johannes explicity would give his nationality as German. If Runciman or others have published more on Johannes/Johns Scottish heritage, it should be referenced here, or the article should make clear that his Scottish heritance is based upon Runcimans speculation as a "may be" alone. ASchudak (talk) 12:47, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The original manuscript of the letter by Leonard of Chios to Pope Niccolò V does no more exists and no one can say if it was a misunderstanding of the Dominican Archbishop of Mitilene or of an unknown copyist to write “Johannis Grande Alemani” (of the German John Grande) instead of “Johannis Grandi Arimini” (of John Grandi – in Italian Giovanni Grandi - of Rimini). The tombstone says that Grandi was “Ariminensis”, i.e. “from Rimini”! Guido4155 (talk) 15:18, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Johannes Grant. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070206044734/http://www.imperiobizantino.com/the_fall_of_constantinopla.htm to http://www.imperiobizantino.com/the_fall_of_constantinopla.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:40, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]