Talk:Johanna Welin/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Khazar2 (talk · contribs) 01:00, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be glad to take this review, Hawkeye; sorry you've had to wait so long on it. Comments to follow in a few minutes. -- Khazar2 (talk) 01:00, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments and checklist

I've made a few tweaks, but I don't really see anything here that needs work--seems like your usual high-quality work. Let me go through the checklist and see if anything else occurs.

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	Article is very brief, but a check of the sources and an independent Google search didn't turn up anything else obvious that needs to be included.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	The images in the gallery probably need individual captions per the GA criteria. I also wonder if having four similar images here is quite pertinent (they all appear to be from the same game.), but it's not out of hand and seems an okay touch to a short article.
	7. Overall assessment.	Pass

Looks like this is very close. I only have a question about some image issues in 6b. -- Khazar2 (talk) 01:25, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have provided captions for the pictures. The gallery was created per WP:LAYIM so as to not overwhelm the page. Hawkeye7 (talk) 02:48, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay--I agree that it seems a shame to delete them from the article. -- Khazar2 (talk) 09:30, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]