This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles
I've asked a tthe appropriate place whether there's any more information--there might be--bios on this family are very extensive.
If not, the appropriate thing to do would be to change to a redirect to Leopold Mozart.. DGG (talk) 17:08, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I grabbed a bit out of Solomon's Mozart biography. Doing an article on Johann Georg is not totally pointless since it helps clarify the connection between Mozart and his first cousin Maria Anna Thekla, by identifying their common ancestor. Opus33 (talk) 23:39, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If his main notability is his descendants, then I agree the article should be merged into one of those descendants. But if anything more can be found about him - perhaps a study of his binding work, then perhaps that could raise the notability factor and justify an article about him. -- kosboot (talk) 17:37, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Well actually, the page you just mentioned is plagiarized from the Wikipedia! If you're skeptical, do take another look at that "enotes" site: they've copied not just the text of the article, but also our Mozart navbox and some other WP messages. Opus33 (talk) 19:43, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]