Talk:Johann Dietrich von Hülsen/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · contribs) 05:58, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Will take this one. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 05:58, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Lead and infobox;
- Johann Dietrich von Hülsen (born 1 June 1693 in Babaziens, died 29 May 1767 in Berlin); just the date range is enough, no need of geographical details fixed
- general lieutenant? I think it is to be "lieutenant general" yes (In English)
- In the infobox the rank is mentioned as general. But as far as I can see per the prose, the highest rank attained by him was "lieutenant general" done
- Section 1;
- (1. Philipp von Weyherr, 2. Christoph Rudolf von Schliewitz); This is not necessary, out of context moved to note
- Section 2;
- Then rank of Otto Magnus von Doenhoff? done
- Modern equivalent of Fahnrich in braces done
- Link all the military ranks throughout the article on the first mention—second lieutenant, first lieutenant, major etc. done
- Then rank of Erhard Ernst von Roeder? done
- promoted to Captain; no need to initial capitals just "captain" done
- Section 2.1;
- Then rank of Leopold I of Anhalt-Dessau? done
- Then rank of Asmus Ehrenreich von Bredow? done
- Halberstadt is over-linked
- Section 2.2;
- Then rank of Joachim Christian von Tresckow? done
- Then rank of Hans Joachim von Zieten? done
- Section 3; all good
- 5.7% confidence, violation unlikely.
- Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:13, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
- thank you! All done! auntieruth (talk) 14:47, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
- Kindly sign the comment. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 14:35, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
- all done. auntieruth (talk) 00:35, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 05:24, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail: