Talk:Johann David Schoepff

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Two ELs will become sources for two book sentences

Not sure on rest of the bio. Fellow has some cool plates though int he back of his book. TCO (talk) 15:56, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Schoepf/Schöpf/Schoepff and/or Schoepf(f)?

This person was both a zoologist and a botanist. I am not sure what his abbreviation is in the field of zoology, but in botany it appears differently: according to his Harvard University Herbarium page, it is Schoepf (B&P and Standard/Label Name); according to his IPNI entry, it is Schöpf (Standard Form, no B&P given). Note that neither site spells the abbreviation with "ff", just one "f", but that they don't agree regarding Standard Form (assuming "Standard Form" and "Standard/Label" means the same thing). At the WP page List of botanists by author abbreviation, his entry shows "Schoepff" (double f); and at List of zoologists by author abbreviation, his entry is listed as "Schoepf(f)"

I would like to get some clarity on this before making further edits. Will someone help with this? Thanks, Hamamelis (talk) 19:14, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Johann Christian Daniel von Schreber referred to him as 'Schöpf' in his 1782 article 'Beytrag zur naturgeschichte der frösche' -- it was Schöpf who provided him with a cast and field notes used to describe Rana pipiens. Unless there is another Schöpf that was also a medic for the Brandenburg troops in America and also liked natural history, but I find that to be too many coincidences. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1010:B158:580D:A601:E49B:A3C0:7100 (talk) 11:54, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]