This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles
There is no need for the this page to have 16 links the subject's site. This definitely makes it appear less like references and more like promotion/spam. I've removed 13 of them, leaving 3 (External links, infobox, 1 reference). Add reliable, third-party, published sources to support facts in the articles.Stesmo (talk) 16:07, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Per WP:RS, references about non controversial facts about article subject are perfectly valid if the are from subject's sources. Moreover, the term "spam" refers to putting the same link into numerous wikipedia articles and the term "promotion" means article text which is purely PR without informational content. Staszek Lem (talk) 18:38, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop cite spamming Wikipedia, Staszek Lem. I've removed 12 unnecessary external links to the Joel225 website. You aren't linking to a single page or press release stating "Hey, we do business in X number of languages" which may be understandable if you couldn't find a reliable, third-party, published source to back up this fact. Instead, you're needlessly linking to the Joel225 page for each language. Stesmo (talk) 16:51, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This page lacks critical review. The practice of "reparative therapy" has been thoroughly rebuked by every mainstream professional medical and counseling organization. — Preceding unsigned comment added by David Cary Hart (talk • contribs) 22:27, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
