Jump to content

Talk:Joe Nichols

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Chart formats?

[edit]

Ok, can someone please tell me what is all the rage with those new chart tables that are colored instead of the plain old ones? Personally, I can't stand the new chart tables - the colors irritate my eyes. And I simplified the discography section as all that info was already available in the singles section. Faris b 18:10, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just because you don't like the style doesn't mean you should undo someone's hard work. Especially with the album information. Camcallister 19:58, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Well no offence that all that info was already on the chart below. May I ask where the new chart format even came from? Because that other one to my knowledge has been around a long time? Also, a good page does not need multi-colored flashy things. A simple format usually is fine.

Faris b 23:52, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't already on there, I had release dates added and was in the process of adding RIAA certifications, album covers and sales information. Many artist pages (many non-country artists as well) use this format. Especially discography pages have been using them for some time. It's not a matter of being flashy, it looks more organized (at least in my opinion)... with the two colors on the chart, it just makes the lines cleaner and shows more of a seperation. Camcallister 16:02, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, but what I meant is that without the lines between the sections instead of just empty space (no lines) doesn't look good. I prefer it with the lines in between the different sections. Then who ever said that charts have to use one style or the other? Faris b 20:07, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've modified it a bit... maybe this can be a compromise (if you like it)... what do you think? Camcallister 21:46, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why thank you very much. That's much better. I guess that's what I really didn't like about that style. It's much better than you. Faris b 01:27, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

2 versions of "I'll Wait For You"

[edit]

There seems to be 2 versions of the video. The first, which isn't played anymore features Joe Nichols with gray hair and such and his wife in the video in the hospital and such, I never liked this version, it was too depressing and I guess others thought so too. The second version is a black and white video with him singing mostly. Why did they change videos?Vala M 14:08, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Joenicholsrevelation.jpg

[edit]

Image:Joenicholsrevelation.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:52, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Joenicholsmanwithamemory.jpg

[edit]

Image:Joenicholsmanwithamemory.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:52, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Joenicholsatraditionalchristmas.jpg

[edit]

Image:Joenicholsatraditionalchristmas.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:52, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MY STEPDAD WAS JESSE RAY NICHOLS.........

[edit]

I WAS WONDERING IF JOE NICHOLS IS HIS GRANDSON.... MY MOM SAYS HE IS... BUT I CANT FIND ANY INFORMATION PLEASE HELP.... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.85.222.149 (talk) 20:32, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Joe Nichols. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:31, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Joe Nichols. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:51, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Joe_Nichols&oldid=1204286081"