Talk:JobBridge

Couple of edits required

Firstly, JobBridge is all one word, can the page title be changed to reflect this.

I also think a section on the schemes pitfalls, how it can be abused, its discriminatory nature towards the disabled and lone parents etc. Squidlimerick (talk) 12:15, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reference to exclusion of people in receipt of Disability Allowance is outdated. This is no longer the case. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.191.234.98 (talk) 10:35, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Title changed; and notice added that it is/may be outdated. - Nabla (talk) 23:23, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Massive problems with this article

I reverted a bunch of IP edits that were blatant vandalism (the addition of the circus infobox was a particular highlight/lowlight) but there are still tonnes of issues with the article. I'll try to give a decent overhaul of the article in the next few days so that it isn't entirely a hit piece. IrishStephen (talk) 17:10, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This article is a joke. Basically a party political for SF and the SP. 145.36.235.4 (talk) 08:37, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article still seems very problematic, despite the work done on it. I've added POV and original research tags. Cyclonius (talk) 20:33, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on JobBridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:13, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]