Jump to content

Talk:Joanne McCarthy (basketball)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Joanne McCarthy (basketball)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: GhostRiver (talk · contribs) 14:33, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Hello! My name is GhostRiver, and I'll be conducting this GA review. I will assess the article against the good article criteria. Once I complete my review, you will have seven days to implement the suggested edits.

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Early life

[edit]


Red XNIn this edit her heritage was removed. Give me a few days to research this. Also, be advised that I am competing in the WP:CUP. Do not promote on Feb 28 or 29.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 19:19, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Basketball career

[edit]

College career

[edit]

Professional career

[edit]

Later life

[edit]

Statistics

[edit]

Notes

[edit]

General comments

[edit]
  • No stability concerns, nominator is primary editor
  • No photos in article
Above initial review — Preceding unsigned comment added by GhostRiver (talkcontribs) 20:40, February 16, 2024 (UTC)-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 05:00, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@GhostRiver: your edit summary says initial review. Does that mean there are more comments coming or should I start working on this?-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 05:03, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Rjjiii

[edit]

A recent comment from GhostRiver sounds like they won't have the time in the near future to wrap this up.[1] @TonyTheTiger: if you are both okay with it, I can wrap up the review so you are not stuck in review limbo:

  1. Nearly all issues from the initial review are resolved.
  2. The line, "The family has German, Irish, and Polish ancestry." was added with a citation to a source that likely does not meet WP:BLPRS (2b).02-29-2024 Starpulse advertised that they accept contributions from publicists and celebrities. And the Polish heritage is sourced to a joke her sister was making about her pubic hair. I don't actually have doubts about their Polish grandparent, but the source isn't adequate. I did search for a better source. Aside from primary sources, I only found one online magazine.[2] If "Polish" is retained the source needs to be replaced.
  3. I did some newspaper searches for Joanne McCarthy outside of basketball to check criteria 3. There isn't very much. The article passes here as it correctly places weight on her basketball career.
  4. The section "Later life" contains only one sentence. It could be expanded or folded into "Personal life", per MOS:OVERSECTION (1b).
  5. Checked Pankow (2016), Jones (2014), and O'Brien (1998). No issues with original research or close paraphrasing.

If points 2 & 4 above are resolved, I'll pass this. Ping me if you have any questions, objections, and so on. Rjjiii (talk) 15:12, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rjjiii, GhostRiver has just posted to TonyTheTiger's talk page that she will not be able to continue her review of this nomination. Thank you very much for taking on the completion of this review; please proceed. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:23, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PrimalMustelid talk 14:27, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Improved to Good Article status by TonyTheTiger (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 364 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:19, 16 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]