This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
I've restored the prior version (retaining the constructive capitalization change, and leaving out "considered excellent by professor Bogusław Milerski" - though as an opinon of a scholar this seems relevant - lets discuss). I have done so after verifying that content appears in source. I Restored two academic sources referring to "Poland as the sick man of Europe?" - a footnote in a secondary source is preferred to the primary piece of writing. Per the cited source, the title of work is "Zydzi u Kolberga" - and refers to the 19th century when this was part of Prussia/Germany with this name - which may be why Tokarska-Bakir and several others use the historic name for the historic period. Icewhiz (talk) 08:30, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This reminds me a Polish saying discussing colors with a blind. Icewhiz lacks elementary knowledge of Polish culture and doesn't know texts by the writer. Are such misinformations allowed here? I would expect that an editor reads several lines to write one, some apparently don't.Verified that content appears in source. - very funny. Xx236 (talk) 08:51, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Even JT Gross assigned the crime to Germans in 1983.
Existence of Jedwabne and Pruchnik was secret for 90% of Poles. There are 218 towns 2500 - 4 000, 130 town 1 000 - 2499, 130 towns below 1000. The crimes were known in the region. Who visits Jedwabne, or even Łomża?Xx236 (talk) 09:03, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Some of the sources are obsolete, published before 2010. The Jedwabne wasn't a problem only of those Poles, who rejected the book by JT Gross, but partially of Gross, who ignored some facts (number of victims), accepted hearsay as eyewitness accounts, accepted contradictory accounts of one person, ignored the context (more than 100 pogroms between Romania and Lithuania), falsely accued Bishop of Lomza and Czeslaw Laudanski. Xx236 (talk) 10:58, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]