Talk:Jo Ann Evansgardner/GA1
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Unexpectedlydian (talk · contribs) 20:54, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello! I'll review this one using the table below - comments to follow shortly. Unexpectedlydian♯4talk‽ 20:54, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
- Hi @Sammielh, I have done an initial review and there are some minor comments in the table below. Thanks for your work on this interesting subject. If you have any questions do let me know. I will put the article on hold now. Unexpectedlydian♯4talk‽ 15:07, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for taking a look at this, @User:Unexpectedlydian! I have left comments below.
- Hi again @Sammielh, thank you for addressing all of the comments. I am happy for this to be promoted to GA now, well done! Unexpectedlydian♯4talk‽ 19:05, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for taking a look at this, @User:Unexpectedlydian! I have left comments below.
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. |
Infobox
Lead Early life
Academic career
Social activism
Later life
| |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. |
Lead Layout Words to watch
Fiction
List incorporation
| |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. |
| |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). |
Source check I will check around 10% of sources. Rodgers, Ann (March 1, 2010)
Butler, Ann (December 19, 1989) Weber, Bruce (July 29, 2009) Haney, Eleanor Humes (1985) Snow, Michael Sean (2004) Weller, Sheila (2008)
| |
2c. it contains no original research. |
| |
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. |
| |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. |
| |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). |
| |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. |
| |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. |
| |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. |
| |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. |
I didn't upload this photo and I haven't been able to find a date for it anywhere.
| |
7. Overall assessment. |