This article is within the scope of WikiProject Musical Instruments, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of musical instruments on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Musical InstrumentsWikipedia:WikiProject Musical InstrumentsTemplate:WikiProject Musical Instrumentsmusical instruments
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music
A member of the Guild of Copy Editors, Stfg, reviewed a version of this article for copy editing on 13 February 2012. However, a major copy edit was inappropriate at that time because of the issues specified below, or the other tags now found on this article. Once these issues have been addressed, and any related tags have been cleared, please tag the article once again for {{copyedit}}. The Guild welcomes all editors with a good grasp of English. Visit our project page if you are interested in joining!
In regards to the question of the notability of this article's subject, Jürgen Michaelis of Jomox is truly going against the grain of the majority of the market trends to provide his craft to many artists desiring excellent true analogy synthesizers. Furthermore, his work is basically hand-made, and it he has gotten not only publicity, but major retails distribute his products. This company certainly is not an insignificant effort. Artists as popular as Prince use JoMoX products, and artists of this caliber shape the history of music for all eternity. Some of Jürgen Michaelis's designs are that of mostly emulations of older gear, such as Roland TR-909; but other products are so innovative that they change the way we think of sound synthesis. There simply needs to be a more experienced Wikipedian than me to help guide the development of this article into an acceptable article.
Lukasz Jarochowski (talk) 08:35, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Wonderful as you may consider the products, that is not a criterion for notability. Coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources is. Please see Wikipedia talk:Notability (organizations and companies). This article is little more than a product catalogue. If you want it seen as notable, you need to write about the company itself , its history, offices, employees, maybe the part it plays in local communities, etc, based on such independent sources. --Stfg (talk) 14:20, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
