Talk:João Magueijo

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

‹See TfM›

Physics: Biographies Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Biographies Taskforce.

Portugal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Portugal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Portugal on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PortugalWikipedia:WikiProject PortugalTemplate:WikiProject PortugalPortugal articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Portugal To-do:

Find correct name The airport is not listed as João Paulo II anywhere. The airport's own website calls itself simply Ponta Delgada, and has no mention of João Paulo.

Improve key articles to Good article

Improve

Review

Category:History of Portugal: lots to remove there
Template:Regions of Portugal: statistical (NUTS3) subregions and intercommunal entities are confused; they are not the same in all regions, and should be sublisted separately in each region: intermunicipal entities are sometimes larger and split by subregions (e.g. the Metropolitan Area of Lisbon has two subregions), some intercommunal entities are containing only parts of subregions. All subregions should be listed explicitly and not assume they are only intermunicipal entities (which accessorily are not statistic subdivisions but real administrative entities, so they should be listed below, probably using a smaller font: we can safely eliminate the subgrouping by type of intermunicipal entity from this box).

Requests

See Requested articles

Assess

Help assessing articles.

Need images

Translate from Portuguese Wikipedia

Wikify

Vote:

Watch this list — Edit this list

References to CERN experiment

I have removed a flippant "it looks that he was right" for the following reasons: 1) no references to today's announcement from CERN 2) no evidence that the fenomenon verified at CERN has to do with Magueijo's theory (even though I personally would be glad if this were shown to be the case) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.56.163.222 (talk) 12:08, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reworded

Reworded the comments about his book (first section) - seemed to contain too much personal opinion. 141.35.111.109 14:55, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted this badly worded "Let's add a rebutal to this theory of light as not a constant. First a contradiction, if light at the moment of the Big Bang was faster than it is now, would not the light we see now be in fact the light from the moment of the big bang. Would we ever see the light after the Big Bang? That contradicts the observation made by Nobel Prize winner George Smoot, he in facts has seen the light fromm 300,000 years after the Big Bang." which was stuck in the biography section. -User:Praguestepcihld, 22 January 2006

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 04:56, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Inflation is main stream

Twice now the phrase more mainstream (before "theory of cosmic inflation") has been deleted without explanation or edit summary. As far as I know this is considered the mainstream theory and the cosmic inflation article says that it is now considered part of the standard hot big bang model. The person making this change should explain why it is necessary. Belief that the mainstream theory is wrong is not good reason to change the encyclopedia. That happens when mainstream scientific opinion changes. SpinningSpark 12:38, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

variable speed of light

... has previously been analysed by Jean-Pierre petit in Modern Physics Letters A in 1988-1989.

I think this correction should be noted in Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.103.41.50 (talk) 17:25, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on João Magueijo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:34, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]