Talk:Jingle All the Way/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Article is a great shape not much to fault it on, just a few minor issues on then it's a pass. I'll fix some of the issues myself, the following still need to be fixed:

"During the chase, Howard keeps running into Officer Alexander Hummell" - Chase? What chase? Rephrase to something like "During his search for the action figure, ..."
" Howard hooks up with a band of brand-spoofing crooks..." - Explain why he "hooks up" with them and why he fights with them. Also swap "hooks up" with something more professional.

"Unused shops in the Seventh Place Mall area were spruced up to..." - Replace "spruced up" with something more professional.

The Rotten Tomatoes figures have changed slightly. - Update figures and accessdate.

Reviewer: Kollision (talk) 04:55, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I think I have fixed all of these issues. Thanks very much for the review. Gran² 10:48, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

Congrats, GA pass. - Kollision (talk) 10:58, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It might be nice to fix links to dab pages in an article (or asking for them to be fixed) before awarding a GA pass in future. The toolbox top right is there for a reason. Alternatively, installing User:Anomie/linkclassifier.js makes such links immediately visible, and I count five in this article (I've fixed one in the lead, but will leave the others for people who know which target is right). Bencherlite ^Talk 11:08, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I really should have. I simply forgot. - Kollision (talk) 13:34, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No problem; I'm a convert to the linkclassifier.js (for this and other reasons) now that I'm using it! Bencherlite ^Talk 13:36, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]