Talk:Jingle (protocol)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.

Hello,

I've been looking at Coccinella, but to me it seems not to have any jingle-support... Maybe someone can check this out and remove the entry...

LaPingvino -- 62.194.157.221 16:44, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

See http://coccinella.cvs.sourceforge.net/coccinella/coccinella/READMEs/README-xmpp?revision=1.1&view=markup NaturalBornKiller 19:07, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What about Trillian Astra? See http://blog.ceruleanstudios.com/?p=352 Pkmugg (talk) 23:57, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jingle (XMPP)

A person revert my rename. Jingle is an extension of XMPP protocol so the good name is Jingle (XMPP) http://xmpp.org/tech/jingle.shtml — Neustradamus (✉) 15:34, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jingle is also a protocol, so that name is just as appropriate? And who cares? There are enough redirects that readers will find this article either way. rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 23:42, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

agree with what ^ said. The article should preferably make clear in its text that Jingle is a XMPP related protocol, but right now there is only one protocol named Jingle that I know of so there is no need to disambig the name. riffic (talk) 10:05, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, good answer, I let Jingle (protocol) — Neustradamus (✉) 17:28, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

p2p?

How can Jingle be entirely peer-to-peer when it's an XMPP extension and XMPP is server-client? Is the initial connection established over a server and the rest is p2p?--92.78.102.252 (talk) 14:45, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, just as any other peer-to-peer protocol used behind NATs. Pavlixnet (talk) 10:35, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Could you expand on this please? I thought it was server-client too. Iamsorandom (talk) 21:11, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

compression format used

Is it appropriate to write what audio and video encoding is used? XEP-0299 says about four video codecs: Dirac, H.264, Theora, VP8. XEP-0180 recommends Theora. XEP-0266 says about three audio codecs: G.711, Opus, Speex.
Qndel (talk) 13:35, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jingle vs. SIP

Can somebody knowledgeable elaborate on the difference between Jingle and SIP? They both deal with session control of multimedia streams. 174.6.80.151 (talk) 13:18, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The main practical difference is that SIP is a standalone protocol, designed specifically for this purpose. Jingle, on the other hand, is an extension to XMPP, which by default provides presence and instant messaging functionality, but can be extended to other purposes. So if you already use XMPP, with Jingle you don't have to deal with a separate protocol, accounts and network - session control is done over the existing XMPP infrastructure, benefitting from integration with other XMPP functionalities - Anonymous 01:19, 30 August 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.87.243.110 (talk)

Is Google dropping it?

Does this imply that Google intends to drop Jingle (and XMPP generally)? Worth mentioning in the article? Open4D (talk) 19:59, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jingle (protocol). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071010121402/http://forums.miranda-im.org/showthread.php?t=13768 to http://forums.miranda-im.org/showthread.php?t=13768

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:01, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]