Jump to content

Talk:Jindřich Marco

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

No infobox

[edit]

Please do not add an infobox. See this arbitration report, and, for a more recent discussion, the talk page for the article on Stanley Kubrick. -- Hoary (talk) 07:18, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Whitewashing history

[edit]

Petr Tausk [cs], the author of a biographical essay the article refers to over a dozen times, was in 1988, when he wrote it for a US publisher, a Czechoslovak national resident in the Czechoslovak Socialist Republic. This may explain why the essay makes no mention of Marco's later, Czechoslovak detention, let alone of uranium mines. (Tausk simply has one paragraph about photographing Britain in 1947 and the next paragraph about "the late 1950s".) -- Hoary (talk) 07:18, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Memoir

[edit]

In his introduction to the Fototorsk book, Vladimír Birgus makes considerable use of Marco's unpublished memoir. Elsewhere, Birgus wrote in 2011: "At the end of this year, his memoirs are to be published by Torst publishing, Prague." ("Jindřich Marco: Photographs from the Years 1945–1948", Photorevue, 1 November 2011. Accessed by the Wayback Machine on 8 November 2018.) I can't find this at WorldCat, and wonder if it was ever published. -- Hoary (talk) 12:10, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Blog-ish sources for Please buy my new song

[edit]

There are also

Each is, I think, of some value. But each could be criticized as merely a personal reflection without external supervision. Some very careful use could perhaps be made of each; meanwhile, I list them here because hunting for them took some effort. -- Hoary (talk) 05:48, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Photography for Anglie

[edit]

Marco photographed London in 1946 (and perhaps in 1947 as well). Tausk writes that his photography for Anglie was "done by working twelve hours a day over a period of seven weeks in 1947". Was this in addition to the hours/days in 1946; or is "in 1947" Tausk's mistake for "in 1946 and 1947"? -- Hoary (talk) 01:26, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

[edit]

  • ... that most of Jindřich Marco's early photography of Budapest was lost when a train carrying his exposed film was ambushed by Red Army deserters, who threw it out of the window?
  • Source: Vladimír Birgus [cs]. Jindřich Marco. Fototorst. Prague: Torst, 2014. ISBN 978-80-7215-423-4. Pages 11–12.
Moved to mainspace by Hoary (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

Hoary (talk) 01:53, 5 January 2025 (UTC).[reply]

  • Comment by nominator: As most of the material in Birgus's introduction to Hořká leta · Evropa (1995) reappears in his introduction to Jindřich Marco (2014), I've guessed that the latter benefits from almost two decades of reflection, etc, and therefore in the article have cited it rather than the former. (The older introduction does have detail that the newer one lacks, so I may yet change my mind.) The newer book isn't at the Internet Archive, but you'll be able to verify the original "hook" via page 21 of Hořká leta · Evropa. As for "ALT1", you'll find much of this (but no mention of Gottwald) on page 31 of Hořká leta · Evropa; for Gottwald, see Moucha's "Message". (Both these sources are in English.) -- Hoary (talk) 00:14, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]