Jump to content

Talk:Jim McCotter

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

For the record "organizations" is spelled "organisations" in New Zealand, although we are attributing the quote to an American. Not sure if there is a rule about that... I presented "organisations" as appeared in North and South. ClaudeReigns 16:22, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Headshot

[edit]

This page still needs a good headshot for the infobox. If you own the copyright to a photo of James D. McCotter, please license it under GNU or Creative Commons so that it may be used in Wikipedia. ClaudeReigns 03:06, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a photo under a fair-use rationale. It may not last. A free use picture is still desirable. ClaudeReigns 08:58, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not NPOV

[edit]

Someone put one or two POV templates here and there, so I'll try to figure out what's wrong with the article, in my opinion, namely:

  1. the criticisms against McCotter isn't substantiated (described carefully) before criticized – the reader may have his/her hard time to estimate whether the allegations are true, or if it's kind of media hype,
  2. citations in References in "Churches That Abuse" Book section needed,
  3. the Media mogul doesn't describe his media career, it just lists the criticisms against it without explanation.

Truth is that some persons (like sometimes me) deserve much criticism, but in order to be encyclopedic, there must be some neutral description as a basis, then the criticisms and their counter-arguments (when existing) must come afterwards, so as to not disturb the general overview. Said: Rursus ☻ 14:09, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Are concerns sufficiently addressed? Speak now or forever hold the mayo. ClaudeReigns (talk) 11:55, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The concerns are very well addresed, and the quality is very much improved. 1000 thanks! Said: Rursus ☻ 15:50, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Purrier resort affair

[edit]

I haven't seen any evidence of the notability of this dispute or the substatiation of this through reliable sources. I should tag this but I don't have my Bag of Tags handy. I can't use blogs as verification either. Has this been documented anywhere?? ClaudeReigns (talk) 00:42, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Jim McCotter. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:39, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Jim McCotter/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

* has two graphics, but only full page shots for relevancy and no shots of the subject only
  • has links to illustrate
  • has multiple sections, but not sure any treated fully yet?
  • has a good breakdown of subheadings

lacks a good headshot, does not detail any significant messages/speeches given at Great Commission International or previous, may have POV balance problems, and some details are still uncited. Have requested headshots from publishers and on talk page, will be able to produce references to GCI speeches which are online, should soon be able to give citations for stray details and can then request a peer review to assess POV. ClaudeReigns 03:31, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Media attention is now filling out, has headshot and three graphics. Recommend B class. ClaudeReigns (talk) 12:22, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 12:22, 25 February 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 19:53, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Jim McCotter. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:17, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Jim McCotter. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:52, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Jim_McCotter&oldid=1200968189"