This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Event Venues, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Event VenuesWikipedia:WikiProject Event VenuesTemplate:WikiProject Event VenuesEvent Venues articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article was put up for deletion due to its lack of third party sourcing. If this is the primary reason, I will find 3rd party sources on the field. However, I don't understand how "It's a college baseball field" is justification for deletion. College baseball has its own WikiProject on Wikipedia. Therefore, I reason that Division I college baseball fields, the venues of a more notable sport, are inherently notable. The Fordham program itself is one of the oldest in the nation and has the most all-time wins of any Division I program. I think this makes this specific venue notable enough to validate an article. If this is an insufficient argument, notify me here and I will obtain third party sources. Kithira (talk) 16:16, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I don't have an argument against the notability of this article, but I do take issue with the claim that college baseball is more notable than college hockey. PowersT13:33, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
College hockey is incredibly popular in the northeast and midwest, far more so than college baseball. It is especially popular, even more so than minor league hockey, in HEA, WCHA, and CCHA territory. However, college baseball enjoys far more popularity than hockey in SEC, ACC, Big XII, Pac-10, Big West, etc. territory. Anyway, my argument is moot now that I have discovered and joined the college hockey WikiProject. All in all, I'd say that college hockey and baseball are about equally notable, as their regional appeal more or less balances out between north and south.Kithira (talk) 15:22, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]