This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
hi my cite for a RealClearPolitics was reverted, even though the referenced wp guidance labels the site as "caution " with no consensus. can we be less draconian in this case? the referenced article is quite thorough and well sourced. the discussion archive on rcp doesnt seem to indicate any major problems. Mikeroetto (talk) 17:01, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Is a better source available? At WP:RSP, RCP is summarized with "Use as a source in a Wikipedia article should probably only be done with caution, and better yet should be avoided". The article may also be WP:RSOPINION ("may be considered reliable for statements as to their author's opinion, but not for statements asserted as fact"). The writer's current employer is deprecated (WP:NEWSMAX). Llll5032 (talk) 23:28, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
