Talk:Jim Garlow

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Christianity: Methodism / Charismatic Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Methodism work group (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Charismatic Christianity (assessed as Low-importance).

NPOV issues

Several paragraphs of the article have a particularly apologetic tone to them, as though written to pre-emptively defend the subject of the article from criticism. Furthermore, they don’t read like an encyclopedia; it’d be worth checking to see if any text in this article was copy/pasted from somewhere else. The problem seems to be systemic (a fairly large portion of the article’s text may suffer from this issue) so it’d be worth a thorough review. 2600:1014:B00B:AE90:3807:A06C:797B:31AC (talk) 05:47, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article definitely has NPOV issues - some paragraphs also criticize Garland and editorialize against his activities, such as the paragraph about his church's tax status. Spiritquest (talk) 02:53, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jim Garlow. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131012060223/http://salina.com/Print/A5--Jim-Garlow-to-head-committee-3-26-10 to http://salina.com/Print/A5--Jim-Garlow-to-head-committee-3-26-10

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:23, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]