Talk:Jim Danforth

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (assessed as Mid-importance).

Animation: People Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Animation people work group.

Review external interviews and augment citations

I've found a couple of reliable sources with details of Danforth's career, please review these and add citations where you can. If you want to reference his IMDB filmography, a reusable reference name has been used.

Of particular interest would be some corroboration of his resignation from the Academy after KING KONG's Oscar. Its hard to find facts about it as there's a lot of conjecture (and Danforth wasn't forthcoming IIRC). Tough one, but worth noting as he's known for resigning in protest after the DeLaurentiis "coerced" a special effects award for the mechanical Kong, though it was only on screen for 13 seconds.

The page has a claim that he was given "carte blanche" for stop-motion work on KONG, but a reference off-site claims he was initially retained, then dropped ... and Rick Baker in a suit was used instead. This could contribute to his ire, if stop-motion effects were NOT used, but the film got an Oscar as if they had. Anyway, any help in providing objective discussion of this would help this article immensely. -- David Spalding (☎ ✉ ✍) 18:35, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I did what I could with that 1978 magazine interview article (not a transcription) and Neil Pettigrew's book, but there were some things that I couldn't document, for example just which Outer Limits episodes he worked on. Just a couple of months prior to that interview, Starlog had a news item about Danforth's resignation, but it didn't really jibe with what was said about it in the article, so I didn't trust either to that. That tag said that the article "doesn't cite any references or sources" (emphasis its) and I couldn't find any way to merely reduce that, so I removed the thing. --Tbrittreid (talk) 22:38, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:

There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 02:53, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]