Talk:Jewsweek

Magazines Low‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Judaism Low‑importance

	Judaism portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Newsweek

I noticed that some anti-semites also used the label Jewsweek when refering to Newsweek magazine, which famously publishes a list of top 50 rabbis in America. [1] ADM (talk) 23:53, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion Candidate

I think this page should be deleted since the magazine is now defunct, the website for sale, and did not have an important effect on Israeli or Jewish culture overall. One is more likely to find a antisemitic or anti-Zionist in Google by looking "jewsweek" after the website too. 68.228.51.49 (talk) 05:12, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jewsweek is defunct, but I don't think that means the Wikipedia article should be deleted. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 05:31, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry to hear it's gone. I was a fan, although I am not Jewish. I think this article could be merged with Benyamin Cohen so the same info doesn't need to be given twice. Steve Dufour (talk) 03:28, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's probably a good idea. This stub probably won't be getting much longer. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 03:43, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do you want to do it? Steve Dufour (talk) 03:51, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 03:59, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Steve Dufour (talk) 04:14, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]