Talk:Jewfish

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles

Fishes

This disambiguation page is part of WikiProject Fishes, an attempt to organise a detailed guide to all topics related to Fish taxa. To participate, you can edit the attached article, or contribute further at WikiProject Fishes. This project is an offshoot of the WikiProject Tree of Life.FishesWikipedia:WikiProject FishesTemplate:WikiProject FishesFishes articles

Untitled

There's currently a discussion about this article on WP:RD — Sebastian (talk) 18:10, August 3, 2005 (UTC)

As a Jew I was proud to have a fish this powerful, derived from a microscopic egg, hatched to become a mighty survivor in such a hostile environment. Then some genius (anus) comes along and names us after the enemy that David slew with a sling shot. David slew Goliath, so in honor of the Jews bring back the Jewfish and pass a law that says you can take one Jewfish a day with a $2.00 stamp like the Snook license in Florida. Maybe we could have one on and one year off if the Jewfish is threatened again.

(/\ the above paragraph made my day, lol /\) - 7/21/2008 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.33.92.145 (talk) 20:28, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Where did the association with Jews come from? Bastie 10:59, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It's called the jewfish because jews could eat it. [1]

odd article

Is this a disambiugation article? If so, it needs a disambig tag. If not, it needs some categories. -- Mikeblas 23:27, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's not really a disambiguation, because some references to the name may be inherently vague, can't be refined to a more specific article. Sardine is similar in nature. I've considered creating a new category of "fish names" for common names that do not identify any particular taxon. Stan 03:22, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a traditional disambig, yes, but it disambiguates nometheless. "Sardine" refers to fish that are at least for the largest part closely related. "Jewfish" (why the name? Are these particularly popular as kosher food?) refers to a lot of unrelated species.

It might be treated similar to what we did ar Warbler.

I would consider this article to go into a subgroup of diusambiguations; "taxon disambiguations" one might say. These cannot 100% follow disambig rules but need to apply a bit of own peculiar style. See also the first section at Jasmine (disambiguation), or Crested Caracara (how to handle a taxonomic split invalidating a common name). Dysmorodrepanis (talk) 09:05, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is just another example of PC getting out of control! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.25.240.100 (talk) 18:38, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Name as offensive

I've commented out the comment about the AFS renaming of this fish. The reference link did not work, and I found nothing on their site to indicate that they were giving "official" names to fish at all. Based on the link above the name has been around since the 17th century. Eclecticology 21:48, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jewfish. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150227123928/http://wafic.org.au/seafood/australian-fish-names to http://www.wafic.org.au/seafood/australian-fish-names

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:54, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]