Talk:Jewelz & Sparks
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Clear assertions of significance?
[edit]Adam9007, how does this article contain clear assertions of significance? There are insufficient reliable sources, there are no charts to prove its notability as a musician, most of the references are primary sources, the musician is not even signed to a major label. Please back your claim. - TheMagnificentist (talk) 14:07, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
- @TheMagnificentist: "There are insufficient reliable sources" - irrelevant to A7. "there are no charts to prove its notability as a musician" - irrelevant to A7. "most of the references are primary sources" - irrelevant to A7. There are numerous credible assertions of significance (such as collaborating with Quilla), and only 1 is needed to survive A7. The claims do not need to be verified or even verifiable to survive A7. Those are matters for standard deletion. Adam9007 (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
- Collaborating with another artist doesn't prove its significance. Even Quilla may not be notable enough. Ah, I read that article. It's okay, I retract my comments. You're right. A7 is irrelevant in this situation.- TheMagnificentist (talk) 08:01, 19 November 2016 (UTC)