Talk:Jet bridge

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion not met

This article is supported by the airport project.

Bridges and Tunnels Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Airbridge

Air Bridge directs here. However, an "air bridge" is the term for planes that would move in swiftly and ferry people out in quick succession.

http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/07/15/lebanon.us.citizens/index.html?section=cnn_topstories http://www.firehouse.com/terrorist/20_APairbridge.html http://english.people.com.cn/200510/07/eng20051007_212957.html

The picture should be replaced by one which is not taken through a window.

Resolved. As of Aug 2008, Airbridge directs to a diambiguation page. (And Air bridge redirects to Airbridge. - ¢Spender1983 (talk) 01:28, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jetway / Jetbridge

Because Jetway is a registered name by a particular manufacturer many airlines and airports have been implementing the more generic "jet bridge" or "boarding bridge" instead. I believe that Wikipedia should do the same, simply redirecting "Jetway" to this article, with "jet bridge" replacing "jetway" in the text.Hatcat 17:30, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I concur. Jetway is a brand name. Jetbridge is the proper term. Neo16287 03:45, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Passenger Boarding Bridge" or "Loading Bridge" or "Aircraft Loading Bridge" are also commonly used terms. Loosenut 23:06, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In the industry the most commonly used term is PLB, "Passenger Loading Bridge". This should be taken into consideration.

Additional info requested for article

When were jet bridges introduced? Which airport was the first to use them? The article should address these questions, I think. KarenSutherland (talk) 11:42, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

History

Agreed, this lacks a history section. Who invented them, etc. ?188.192.117.79 (talk) 06:49, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is this really under the scope of Wikiproject Bridges?

I am not convinced this article is under the scope of Wikiproject Bridges. A bridge designer would not have the expertise to design such a structure. I would consider it to be more under the scope of mechanical engineering than civil or structural engineering (akin to an elevator or escalator). I thought I might post here first before deleting it from bridge categories. - ¢Spender1983 (talk) 01:34, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I put it there as it is commonly called a Jet Bridge, and is properly a kind of movable bridge (as is a drawbridge used in a fortification, the purview of a military engineer). Leonard G. (talk) 00:36, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can you provide a reference that compares a jet bridge to either a moveable bridge or a covered bridge? - ¢Spender1983 (talk) 07:18, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gallery

The gallery has become way overloaded, with much redundancy. Manufacture's names in image titles are not relevant to the topics illustrated (they could be added to image page text, however). While WP policy discourages galleries I do not agree with that policy, nor in particular with the forcing of images down to barely visible thumnails. I have a few images from a recent trip that are considerable improvements over most of those in the current gallery. IMHO the selection of an image from a competing set should be based upon its didactic value, with choices between competing images based achievement of illustrative purpose, ability to illustrate multiple points, compositional merit and image aesthetics. Your comments are solicited. - Leonard G. (talk) 20:17, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cleaned up gallery. Need image of multi-button control console, I have uploaded modern type. - Leonard G. (talk) 18:32, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re-rated C class

I really don't understand why this article was ever given B-class rating and Top importance. I've re-rated it C-class (though it barely qualifies, being largely unreferenced) and Mid importance. If you disagree, please discuss. MegaPedant (talk) 20:33, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

History?

Does anyone know how and when jet bridges came to be? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.186.5.185 (talk) 22:06, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jet bridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130418093336/http://archives.californiaaviation.org/airport/msg13033.html to http://archives.californiaaviation.org/airport/msg13033.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:34, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Invention filing date of 1960 with prototype testing happening in 1958

There appears to be a hole in the story of the History of the invention. Here is the patent awarded to Yuen Frank Der:

https://patents.google.com/patent/US3060471A/en

It states that this invention has a date of being "Filed July 27, 1960". But more than two years earlier, the April 21, 1958 issue of LIFE Magazine reported on the testing of the jetway prototype:

"AIRPORT"S MOBILE COVERED BRIDGE"

https://books.google.com/books?id=hFMEAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA50&lpg=PA50

So there appears to be a significant discrepancy here. It would be highly unusual that an invention would be publicly displayed with no patent protection, and then more than 2 years later, the inventor files for a patent. It is apparent that a big part of the story here needs to be filled in. --Tdadamemd19 (talk) 06:04, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sleeve?

Aren't these also referred to as "sleeves"? I think this should be mentioned in the article.Zagraniczniak (talk) 14:27, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting addition

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

Anderson, Eric (Dec 19, 2019). "Albany airport's two dual loading bridges to be retired". Times Union.

Apparently Albany airport used to have jet bridges that extended over the wings of 737s. --N8_wilson 🔔 22:41, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reason(s) LCCs don't use jet bridges

I think in addition to the cited reason (cost) there is at least one other reason: turnaround times - Ryanair for example does two-door-boarding (otherwise unheard of for planes the size of a Boeing 737) which simply isn't possible using jet bridges as they currently exist. Maybe this should be added to the article. 213.95.33.60 (talk) 23:29, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]