Talk:Jesu, meine Freude/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: 3family6 (talk · contribs) 15:50, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
Writing is solid, and no copyvios present.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
I have only intermediate knowledge of German, but I was able to understand the German language sources enough to confirm that they do support the content in the article.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
Focused on the subject, but also provides enough historical context.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
Presented in a very neutral, encyclopedic fashion.
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
Highly stable, single-author article.
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
The image of Johann Crüger had a small licensing tag problem (which I've found is extremely pervasive in Commons) where it was tagged for use in European countries, but not the US. I updated the tag to include the US under the public domain license. This does not greatly affect the article in any way, so it shouldn't bias this review.
Overall: Well done. I couldn't find any problems with the article.--¿3family6 _contribs 16:15, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Pass/Fail:

Thank you! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:25, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]