This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
A new single-purpose account is trying to change the description of Hamilton's NY State Senate caucus, the Independent Democratic Caucus. The essence is that while elected as Democrats, the IDC supports the Republican leadership in the State Senate. No reliable source disputes that; for example, a NY Times article about the IDC states that "... the Independent Democratic Conference, a coalition of eight Democratic senators who collaborate with Republicans to share leadership in the chamber. By doing so, members of the I.D.C. reap perks and power that they would not normally receive had they remained with the mainline Democrats."
I won't break 3RR, but I believe the community will agree that the nature of the IDC is of key importance to Hamilton's political status, and needs to be properly described in the lede -- as it was until these recent edits. Kschlot1 (talk) 01:10, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Describe as supporting Republican control, obviously. The nature of the IDC is extremely well-cited. It feels like this account is quibbling over the details of the wording in order to obscure the overarching thrust of the source, which fairly unequivocally says that while it is technically part of a power-sharing deal, the IDC hands control of the chamber to the Republicans in exchange for stipends and other personal benefits. It should probably also be added as a note in the "political party" section of his politician template. --Aquillion (talk) 08:43, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
