Talk:Jesse Eisenberg/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: DrStrauss (talk · contribs) 15:36, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Passed
[edit]- 1. Well written?:
Pass - 2. Verifiable?: Pass
- 3. Broad in coverage?: Pass
- 4. Neutral point of view?: Pass
- 5. Stable?: Pass
- 6. Images?: Pass
One very minor point: on the topic of school anxiety, another source would be good just for BLP verification but that's not a ground for rejecting it as a GA. Well done!
DrStrauss talk 15:43, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Reversing approval by novice reviewer
[edit]This was one of seven reviews posted within a 40 minute period. None of them were complete reviews; as the reviewer noted on his or her talk page, I didn't realise that GA was such a refined endeavour, rather just a sort of stamp
.
The article still needs to be given a thorough review by a knowledgeable reviewer, so it has been put back into the reviewing pool. Any subsequent review will be done on a different review page. BlueMoonset (talk) 21:29, 26 February 2017 (UTC)