Talk:Jesús Vidaña
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Suggest Rename Article
[edit]Jesús Vidaña is no more the subject of this article than Salvador Ordóñez and Lucio Rendón are. Maybe a name should be found for the incident and the three individuals should redirect here? Just a thought. SPACKlick (talk) 15:14, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Jesús Vidaña. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070317210052/http://www.jornada.unam.mx:80/2006/08/17/056n1soc.php to http://www.jornada.unam.mx/2006/08/17/056n1soc.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:32, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
4 km/h for 270 days?
[edit]The article states that their average speed for the 270 days was 4 km/h. Unless my math is way off, that means that they travelled 96 km/day or nearly 26000 km in total. That's an incredible distance to travel, 3 times the straight line distance of 8800 km mentioned in the following paragraph. How can it be correct? 49.226.227.101 (talk) 19:57, 14 January 2017 (UTC)