Jump to content

Talk:Jeriome Robertson

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleJeriome Robertson has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 6, 2011Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on July 20, 2011.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that in his only full season in Major League Baseball, Jeriome Robertson (pictured) won 15 games and finished seventh in Rookie of the Year voting?

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Jeriome Robertson/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Albacore (talk) 19:46, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

[edit]
  • Robertson pitched 184.1 innings and posted a win-loss record win–loss record
  • Win-loss record in the infobox, same thing
  • (2002-2003)->> (2002–2003)
  • Robertson has a record of 10–7, 135 strikeouts, and an ERA of 4.07 change to "had"?
  • His 15 wins led all pitchers in the league -caps on the "H"
  • After a month there, in which he pitched four games, going 1–3 with a 5.54 ERA,[4] He same
  • Not a requirement, but alt text would be nice for the infobox photo.
  • URL showing in ref 33
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Waiting improvements. Albacore (talk) 19:46, 6 August 2011 (UTC) Passed. Albacore (talk) 20:42, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]