Talk:Jereboam O. Beauchamp/GA1
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Hi! I'll be reviewing this article for GA status, and should have the full review up soon. Dana boomer (talk) 01:26, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS):
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Overall a great article, and so I am passing it to GA status. My only comment is that the image of John Pope has a deprecated license, but as I'm sure the image is PD due to age anyway, I'm not going to hold up the review on a technicality. Please let me know if you have any questions. Dana boomer (talk) 01:46, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail:
