Talk:Jeopardy! Teen Tournament

This article was nominated for deletion on 16 December 2019. The result of the discussion was redirect.

	Television portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Mid	This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This redirect is supported by the Television game shows task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Category for Dayton Accords Tiebreaker Round?

A user at IP 76.188.94.97 recently edited the article to replace the Tiebreaker Round category 1995 with U.S. CITIES. I do not have this game on tape. Can somebody authenticate this edit? Robert K S 22:24, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Federman winner.jpg

Image:Federman winner.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 21:47, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Taken care of. Robert K S 06:22, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regional Auditions

Are the example regional audition locations given under "Contestant Selection--1990s" actual locations? Perhaps adding those to the later sections would be a good idea. Now they're assigned, based on your reported location during online test registration, suggesting that instead of traveling across America, now there are set locations. I'm not sure about all the regions, but in 2007, Midwest students went to Chicago, and one was somewhere in California. CrashCart9 (talk) 01:15, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

References

The entire article has only one reference, and it points to a fansite. Are there any additional references editors know of? Sottolacqua (talk) 13:26, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Looking for anything in particular? Robert K S (talk) 23:02, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Official sites: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]
Press releases: [7] [8]
News articles: [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30] [31] [32] [33] [34] [35] [36] [37] [38]
Other web sites: [39] [40] [41] [42] [43] [44] [45]

Robert, you're the primary editor of all Jeopardy! articles, yet instead of attempting to improve articles by properly sourcing them with reliable and acceptable sources, you engage in edit warring, removing refimprove tags without addressing the issue. Why not just add the references to these sites when someone tags the article with refimprove instead of being forced to go through this exercise of another editor posting a request for references on the talk page? Ѕōŧŧōľäċqǔä (talk) 23:28, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What makes me the "primary editor"? I'm just here to try and mitigate deletionist damage. I didn't write this article. I remove refimprove banners when no issue has actually been raised. If you're going to add them, (1) post your reason on the talk page, and (2) you should only do so after making a good-faith effort to solve the problem yourself. Do you ever do a search before adding a banner? Or are you only interested in blighting up the place with banners and tags? I'm happy to try and help address any specific issues with sourcing. But I won't stand for banners being wantonly thrown here and there without cause. Cheers, Robert K S (talk) 19:54, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]