Talk:Jennifer Griffin

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Needs a "Controversy Section" to deal with her reporting on the Arizona shooting, where she pushed forward documents she claimed were from the DHS that were full of errors and blatent mischaracterizations. Her journalism was so sloppy that it drew lound public condemnation including this article;

http://www.rightsidenews.com/2011011012538/editorial/us-opinion-and-editorial/obama-officials-use-fox-news-to-smear-conservative-group-in-shootings.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.59.149.78 (talk) 07:20, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

She has (ever since Ed Henry was suspended for his sexual affair) been covering Hillary Clinton's campaign.

While she still does work on national security, it's nowhere near on the level she used to, her major role (at the present time) is Hillary's presidential run for FOX News, this should be reflected in the article. I find her a breath of fresh air compared to that smirky Ed Henry as well (who has since been reinstated but Griffin has kept her role on Hillary's press core). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.160.158.150 (talk) 23:39, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jennifer Griffin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070407180239/http://www.cjr.org/issues/2004/4/matloff-warmoms.asp to http://www.cjr.org/issues/2004/4/matloff-warmoms.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:50, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Griffin confirmed, not repeated

This discussion has been disrupted by block evasion, ban evasion, or sockpuppetry from the following user:

Trying to reconnect (talk · contribs · block log · spi · lta)

Comments from this user should be excluded from assessments of consensus.

Trying to reconnect please stop edit warring until you have responded to this. soibangla (talk) 23:54, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As per multiple reliable sources, which is what we rely on here:

Jennifer Griffin confirmed...Other outlets confirmed

Trump calls on Fox News to fire reporter who confirmed some parts of Atlantic story

Other beat reporters had confirmed aspects of the Atlantic story, too

Fox News Reporter Doubles Down on Confirmation

Griffin, a national security correspondent for Fox News, reported that sources had confirmed key details

Jennifer Griffin, a national security correspondent for Fox News, confirmed

Jennifer Griffin, who reported on Friday that she was able to confirm

soibangla (talk) 23:35, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

~~Do you find it the least bit hypocritical to ask me to stop edit warring, when you have made 4 reverts to this very phrasing in 25+ hours?~~

~~read this Journalism’s New Propaganda Tool: Using “Confirmed” to Mean Its Opposite Trying to reconnect (talk) 23:59, 7 September 2020 (UTC)~~[reply]

What Greenwald says here is irrelevant. Multiple reliable sources say she confirmed, not repeated. This has been abundantly clear from the start. soibangla (talk) 00:04, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It not irrelevant, because as editors, we are not obligated to use the exact words used by sources. We have discretion to phrase it differently, where appropriate, as in this case per the well-articulated arguments by Greenwald. Trying to reconnect (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 00:08, 8 September 2020 (UTC) [reply]

"Repeated" means she just went on the air and parroted what others reported. That's not what she did. She contacted her own sources and confirmed. That's what credible journalists do. And editors don't have discretion to phrase it differently in ways that contradict or distort what multiple reliable sources say. soibangla (talk) 00:15, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

We don't know who she contacted, and we don't know who The Atlantic talked to, so we have no way of knowing if she contacted her own sources and confirmed. The most we can write is that hat she said she confirmed it, but not state as fact that she did in Wikipedia's voice. Trying to reconnect (talk) 00:38, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]