Talk:Jeni's Splendid Ice Creams

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 23 November 2013 by reviewer Green Cardamom (talk · contribs).

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

https://www.nbcnews.com/business/your-business/how-jeni-s-splendid-ice-creams-handled-listeria-crisis-n851336

Design

Should a section be included that compares the company's original packaging with the new packaging? (Kizlurtzman (talk) 20:18, 22 February 2020 (UTC))[reply]

List of flavors

I disagree with the edit by GreenC to add a list of flavors to the article. If there are specific flavors that independent sources have made note of, I could see mentioning those in prose (with sources); otherwise, it's an inappropriate simple listing (WP:NOTDIRECTORY#7). Schazjmd (talk) 14:40, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sourced some flavors - all sources contain contextual information that could be included in a conversion to prose. -- GreenC 18:10, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for adding sources. I do think prose would be better. Schazjmd (talk) 18:18, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't disagree and it would help reduce the casual IP type editors inserting their favorite flavor into Wikipedia. Just a matter of time and energy to write it and properly format the cites. -- GreenC 21:28, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GreenC, I'd be glad to take a stab at it. Unless you'd rather do it yourself...don't want to step on your toes.

Schazjmd (talk) 21:41, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Schazjmd:, late to discussion but I tend to agree, per WP:NOTEVERYTHING. Just because the existence is verified in eatery guides doesn't mean the inclusion is due. It's like listing out every single reference verifiable screw item in Hillman Solutions, which is the Hilman stuff sold at Ace Hardware. Graywalls (talk) 18:35, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Henry Crown Fellows

On 27 February 2019, User:Mackmo added this page to the Category:Henry Crown Fellows The body of the text has no mention of the Aspen Institute's Henry Crown Fellowship, a program whose participants are individual entrepreneurs and not businesses. No citation or authentication is provided among the existing references, and the user hasn't contributed to this WP in a year (since 1 November 2022). -- Deborahjay (talk) 10:20, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I agree this category should only be on pages for individuals as it's an individual level accomplishment. Since it was my error, I will go remove the category now. If you're curious, here's the source: https://agln.aspeninstitute.org/profile/4041. I don't think how recently someone has contributed is relevant to a conversation about the accuracy of a contribution. Mackmo (talk) 11:47, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Listeria incidents and the response needs expansion

NBC wrote an entire piece dedicated to this, so this section based on independent writing of the journalist should be incorporated into the article. Graywalls (talk) 18:58, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The crisis response was "technically perfect", according to an industry specialist. We need to be careful of due weight. There are no known cases of anyone getting sick, even though our article incorrectly described it as a "outbreak" - the initial incident involved two pints of ice cream. The recent incident was described only as "possibly", at an outsourced company. -- GreenC 21:26, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Association of Public Health Laboratories released a statement which mentions that Jeni's hired a law firm to file a public records request against the Nebraska Department of Agriculture Food Laboratory re the listeria finding.Dialectric (talk) 23:40, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So? Maybe, Nebraska Department of Agriculture Food Laboratory did something incorrect, and Jenni were justified protecting themselves. I really don't know, but we are not in the business of reporting innuendo like this, not covered by reliable secondary sources. We are not investigative reporters digging for dirt in primary sources. Futhermore your characterization of "against" is strange. All that link says is they wanted to see the lab report before deciding what to do about the recall, which is what you would expect, verify the source. The recall cost them millions of dollars, of course they want to see the lab report. -- GreenC 00:11, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]