Talk:Jen Handley

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soap Operas, an effort to build consistent guidelines for and improve articles about soap operas and telenovelas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit WikiProject Soap Operas, where you can join the project and/or the discussion.Soap OperasWikipedia:WikiProject Soap OperasTemplate:WikiProject Soap Operassoap opera articles

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Australia: Television Low‑importance

	Australia portal Jen Handley is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian television (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Latest sources

What issue of inside soap was it, who wrote the article and which page was it on? Also You have used the same reference twice for the other magazine.RAIN*the*ONE ^BAM 02:15, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rain, you've hit the nail on the head. These sources are taken from fansites, which prove that Conquistador2k6 does not own the magazine articles and therefore cannot verify what they actually say. Plus, there's the matter of missing authors, dates, pages and issue numbers. - JuneGloom Talk 14:12, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've been thinking about this some more and I believe we should remove the references. They're just not reliable enough. I also noticed Conquistador2k6 tried to recreate Joanna Evans the other day despite the fact that article was redirected because of an AfD and the sources they provided were not good enough to establish notability. The only reason I let Serendipity Gottlieb stay was because I had some book refs available. I think it's time to drop C2k6 a note on their talkpage too. - JuneGloom Talk 16:07, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah they're not. I think perhaps it should be redirected now. Not sure if Jen is mentioned in any of the books? I'm wondering if this citing inside soaps from fansite's is from the edits I made to Carmella, but at the end of the day I saw the scans and there was an issue date with it. There was another I left out because it had nothing to prove it's realiablity.. With offline refs then you have to assume good faith anyway, I think that's more acceptable if the article has plenty of online references, which this does not. Good work on saving Ren though, I've got an image of her saved ;).RAIN*the*ONE ^BAM 16:35, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't looked in the books for Jen, but I struggled to find sources for this article (I added the one online ref). It wasn't you, this has been happening for a while and it's my fault for not putting a stop to it sooner. - JuneGloom Talk 17:24, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]