Talk:Jem Godfrey

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Low-importance).

Progressive Rock Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Progressive Rock, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Progressive rock on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Progressive RockWikipedia:WikiProject Progressive RockTemplate:WikiProject Progressive RockProgressive rock articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Godfrey's own views on his Wikipedia page, and the explanation for some of the "vandalism" in the article, can be heard in this blog entry of his: http://thenewcube.blogspot.com/2007/05/wikipedia-urgent-appeal.html Bondegezou 15:27, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I want to make wikipedia aware of something.

Is this page on anyone's watchlist? Because this edit, which is a vandlism stuck around for 4 months and 6 days until I reverted it. That's really odd how it stayed around for so long. BT^C 21:08, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think part of the problem may be that Jem is in favour of his Wikipedia article being of dubious accuracy. Commune in the Shetlands, what? RazerWolf (talk) 14:28, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jem Godfrey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060928232521/http://www.prs.co.uk/DocsRepository/4800/ to http://www.prs.co.uk/DocsRepository/4800/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:31, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of sources

I'm not sure I've encountered a Wikipedia biography with a higher content:sources ratio. Is anyone else concerned about this? (And I count myself a fan of Godfrey's music.) - AppleBsTime (talk) 16:19, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]