Talk:Jeffrey Epstein VI Foundation
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 11 July 2019. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Jeffrey Epstein VI Foundation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140407092735/http://www.jeffreyepsteinscience.com/Founder.html to http://www.jeffreyepsteinscience.com/Founder.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:52, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
Jeffrey Epstein pedophilia controversy
[edit]Surely this belongs on any page dedicated to Epstein, especially one that reads like a press release? There has to be some controversy about the program at Harvard by now? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.108.213.168 (talk) 19:01, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
Agreed! 67.208.190.2 (talk) 20:37, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
Maintenance template removal
[edit]Hi all, I tried to make the language of the page more neutral and less promotional, and back each claim up with citations. If you agree that the page is now neutral enough, the tag can be removed. Thanks, Viribex (talk) 16:46, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Cecile De Jongh
[edit]De Jongh's husband was the Virgin Islands Governor for 2 terms from 2007-2015, there have been 2 governors since then. so it should say that she's the wife of the "former governor" or that she is the "former first lady of the virgin islands".
Done Nice catch; it slipped right past me. Did I phrase it right?
Weeb Dingle (talk) 20:14, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 27 August 2019
[edit] | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please add:
1.) The Jeffrey Epstein VI Foundation has in addition to supporting science research supports peace accords and initiatives. Donations included, Save Darfur Coalition, Nelson Mandela Children's Fund, Friends of Israel Defense Forces, Philippe Costeau Foundation, the Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission.
2.) The Jeffrey Epstein VI Foundation supported the International Peace Institute's launch in Bahrain.
3.) The Jeffrey Epstein VI Foundation also established a fellowship fund at the Peace Institute to honor Richard Hooper, Senior advisor to the UN Under-Secretary-General for the Department of Political Affairs who was killed 2003 in the Canal Hotel bombing in Baghdad.
Source:
- https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/jeffrey-epstein-armistice-activist-heralds-new-yorks-international-peace-institute-into-bahrain-203260561.html 93.211.208.122 (talk) 21:48, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
Not done: please provide independent reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. — Newslinger talk 16:47, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- To explain: PR Newswire is not a reliable source. The company simply archives and distributes press releases; therefore, in this instance, the actual source for the claims is the foundation itself, so still needing verification.
- Also, like the article itself, there is a glaring lack of dates, like specifically WHEN these causes were actually supported. It's disingenuous to "accidentally" give the impression that the foundation has been a long-term or ongoing supporter of a project when it may have simply sent one $1,000 check a decade ago.
Weeb Dingle (talk) 17:14, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
- Also, like the article itself, there is a glaring lack of dates, like specifically WHEN these causes were actually supported. It's disingenuous to "accidentally" give the impression that the foundation has been a long-term or ongoing supporter of a project when it may have simply sent one $1,000 check a decade ago.
Reliable sources and BLP
[edit]I have removed a slanderous claim about multiple scientists, many of them living, which was cited to an article that did NOT say the Foundation supported any of these scientists--and mentioned none of them but Edelman and Nowak. HouseOfChange (talk) 10:23, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
Defunct?
[edit]If the claim that the foundation is "now defunct" is true (I can't access the source cited), then the tense of the rest of the article needs to be changed. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:36, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Donation to a foundation in New York
[edit]International Peace Institute received (from the foundation), a donation of 375,000 dollars in 2012 [1]. 89.8.168.191 (talk) 15:38, 23 October 2020 (UTC)