Jump to content

Talk:Jefferson Pier

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

It's close to the Zero Milestone, isn't it? --G Clark | Talk 14:49, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Milestone is a few blocks north, at the same longitude as the Pier. — Eoghanacht talk 15:12, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Not quite on the same meridian. GPS readings show the Zero Milestone was set about a foot off the meridian. --Spewey 18:27, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Inscription obliterated?

[edit]

There is an area on the current Jefferson Pier marker stone, immediately below the date and above the words "District of Columbia", where stone has been crudely chiseled away. The spacing of the other lines of text and the otherwise smooth surface of the stone indicate that something was once inscribed there. Does anyone know what it was? Scott Johnson 16:26, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to know that myself. I suspect that it was the name of some government official, surveyor, or contractor that was later deemed to be unsuitable for a surveying pier. — Joe Kress 00:34, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jefferson Pier. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:06, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]