Talk:Jeepers Creepers (2001 film)/Archive 1

Archive 1

Fair use rationale for Image:Jeepers Creepers film.jpg

Image:Jeepers Creepers film.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 17:41, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

I thought the film was really good, even though the contents was quite disturbing. Notice how Darry and his sister are not just innocent lambs to be slaughtered but actually put themselves in danger because of mischief and curiosity. Darry stubbornly insists on going down the pipe where the creeper stores his victims, despite his sister telling him not to. Notice how rude they are to the psychic who tries to help them. How sorry can we feel for them? The film shows how powerful our curiosity can be when it comes to evil. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.229.241.171 (talk) 12:39, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Plot overview

It seems like the plot overview is a little too scene-by-scene, and also isn't worded like an encyclopedic plot synopsis should be, "his new eyes... Darry's old eyes." being an example of that. The synopsis could be cleaned up to be more concise and encyclopedic.24.11.172.174 (talk) 07:16, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

It is, is it?

Looks, like it should be placed in the gargoyles category for some critics.--74.34.87.191 (talk) 02:19, 9 March 2012 (UTC)