Talk:Jeans (film)/GA3

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: –– Jezhotwells (talk) 02:40, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   Very poor prose throughout. Please get assistance to copy-edit and rewrite the article in good, clear English, paying attention to to grammar, spelling, style, clarity and readability.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   I fixed four disambiguation links, please check that the correct targets were found.[1]

   I tagged one dead link

   BB reviews at [[2] is not a reliable source

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   The article seems a little thin, but perhaps there is no ore to be said about this film.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   This article needs completely rewriting to comply with the criteria of "reasonably good prose" which it is a long way away from at present. THere are outstanding dead links and one dubious source. Thus, I will not not be listing it at this time. Please read and understand the criteria at WP:GA?.–– Jezhotwells (talk) 03:02, 5 April 2010 (UTC)