This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
I suggest that we restore the list of her husbands. That falls under the category of basic personal information that we are apt to cover in most biographies, and is of particular value because they are all three notable (blue-linked) individuals. Also, such basic information helps us see this person as a full person. The AWM saw fit to mention it in their biography of her. We may wish to split Biography into Career (up top) and Personal life (down bottom, as this is not the key to her notability.)
I would concur with scrubbing the phrasing as one husband being her "advisor"; we don't actually have a source indicating that they were married while she was his advisee, and as some people would view that as an inappropriate romantic relationship, it's a WP:BLP concern. (And I would discourage others from doing deep-dive research just so we can use this descriptor.) --Nat Gertler (talk) 16:15, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]